- Terry Goss is a Law professor at George Washington University.
- None of the existing amendments give answers to the basic questions we have today.
- We should have no expectation of privacy in public.
- There is a difference between short term and long term surveillance.
- Most of the technology already exists for Facebook to track using open planet.
- Lawyers at Facebook, Microsoft, Google, etc have more power over govt/constitution.
- There have been efforts to propose a meaningful privacy commission in America.
- There are people at Google, Facebook, and Twitter that have more control over privacy/free speech than the courts do.
- Justice Scalia determined that the use of thermal imaging technology outside of the house was an invasion of privacy.
- Jurors give more weight to the pictures of the brain than other evidence.
Questions:
- How can we find a basic precedent for privacy issues online if the founding fathers couldnt have even dreamed of the technology today.
- Have there been any cases decided about privacy in public?
- How do lawyers of google, facebook, etc have more power?
- Will there most likely be an amendment made addressing online privacy issues?
- Does probable cause ever come into play for example in the thermal imaging case?
No comments:
Post a Comment